Every couple of years, a hot, new trend bursts its way into the collective lexicon of the B2B marketer. In recent years, predictive marketing and ABM took center stage as marketers looked to hone in on the data that underpins just about everything th
I thought it might be good to go over this in some more detail.
Before we start, let’s talk some basic definitions:
|Metric Acronym||Stands For||Means|
|CPC||Cost Per Click||£x for 1 Click on your Link/Advert|
|CPA||Cost Per Acquisition||£x for a Desired Outcome (e.g. A Completed Transaction)|
|CPL||Cost Per Lead||£x for a Qualified Lead|
|CPM||Cost Per Thousand||£x for 1,000 Ad Impressions|
The first 3 – CPC, CPA, and CPL – are performance metrics. CPM, however, is not.Can you spot the odd one out?
A performance metric is one that delivers a certain specific result for your money. Clicks, sales, or leads – they’re all specific and useful end results.
Impressions, however, wouldn’t fall into the same category – they are one step higher up the sales funnel than the other 3. That’s not to say that impressions are not useful, because they are. In terms of delivering branding and audience reach, CPM is the industry standard. It’s just not very useful as a performance buying metric.
CPM campaigns are about delivering visibility. That’s why I’ve said in the past that CPM is a kind of bridge between old-school media buying and digital. It’s the metric for buying audience, and for delivering a message to that audience.
The bottom line for publishers – and they’re the people who will be delivering a CPM campaign – is that CPM pays them for serving ad impressions. So, if the advertiser orders 1,000,000 impressions, and the publisher delivers 1,000,000 impressions, the publisher gets paid.
That’s great if, as an advertiser, your primary objective is visibility – those 1,000,000 impressions mean that your brand has been seen 1,000,000 times. But if you’re looking for anything more – deeper engagement, site traffic, expressed interest or sales – then the metric lets you down. Why? Because the publisher has no reason whatsoever to try to help you achieve those ends. You’re paying them for impressions, remember, so that’s what you’re going to get.
It’s unfair to expect anything else, really. After all, you get what you pay for (not monkeys for peanuts, in this instance, but impressions for CPM). Impressions give you a lot of things, but a guaranteed performance end result is not one of them. In reality, you can spend large portions of budget on CPM and drive zero traffic, generate no leads, and see no sales upside. Which, again, isn’t a criticism of using CPM as a buying metric – it’s just important to understand precisely what it is that you’re buying.
There’s a possible argument that as CPM delivers large reach for relatively small costs, it can be used as the foundation for delivering against any performance target and do so cost-effectively. Let’s take a look at that maths with lead generation as the advertiser’s desired end-goal. In this example, let’s say that a CPL buy might cost £80. How does CPM advertising at £5 stand up?
On a CPM basis, buying 1,000,000 impressions at £5 would yield the advertiser 40 leads, effective CPL £125 – not competitive compared with our £80 straight-CPL model.
|CPM Buy||CPL Buy|
|1,000,000 Impressions @ £5CPM|
|0.02% Click Rate = 200 Clicks|
|20% Convert to Leads = 40 Leads|
|40 Leads for £5,000||40 Leads for £3,200|
|Effective CPL = £125||CPL = £80|
Of course, the maths varies depending on the CPM you’re paying, and the CPL price. We’ve taken our assumptions from the experience that our team has had in the industry – actual results will differ.
The overall point is, buying specifically for the results you’re looking for will generally deliver better, and be cost-effective. There’s a big security upside too – when buying CPM the advertiser has to pay for the impressions delivered whether they hit a performance results target or not. Buying with performance metrics negates that risk – you only pay for the results that you want – no deliver, no cost.
A recent conversation that we had with a client, when discussing the opportunity to buy on a cost-per-lead basis: “our agency doesn’t really see how CPL fits into their existing CPM activity”.
That’s unsurprising – the two activities are very different. Different transmission methods, different publishers, different metrics for different end results. CPM activity may well be measured against how many leads it generates by the advertiser and media planner, but that doesn’t change the fact that a publisher is focused on one thing alone – delivering impressions.
What’s your end strategy? That’s the key factor in determining the best spending metric. Buy on a metric that delivers the results you’re seeking – whether that’s leads, sales, clicks, or impressions. Paying your delivery partner for the results that you’re looking for incentivises them to succeed, and puts the onus on them to do the hard work.
- Goodbye ‘Live Leads’, hello ‘Leads’
- CDPs Promote Rock Hard Data Abs, But It Takes Work
- New Advertiser Report User Type
- Recommended White Paper Improvements
- Report Builder Scheduled Sending